<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: some thoughts on file explorers</title>
	<link>http://org.against.org/70/</link>
	<description>slightly biased and undoubtful pieces of random information</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Grande</title>
		<link>http://org.against.org/70/#comment-6428</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Grande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://org.against.org/70/#comment-6428</guid>
		<description>Didn't copy the links for some reason:
http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/6210/oldermy9.png
and
http://img504.imageshack.us/my.php?image=newerze6.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t copy the links for some reason:<br />
<a href="http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/6210/oldermy9.png" rel="nofollow" class="external">http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/6210/oldermy9.png</a><br />
and<br />
<a href="http://img504.imageshack.us/my.php?image=newerze6.png" rel="nofollow" class="external">http://img504.imageshack.us/my.php?image=newerze6.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Grande</title>
		<link>http://org.against.org/70/#comment-6426</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Grande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://org.against.org/70/#comment-6426</guid>
		<description>The nice thing about the Mac on is if you are copying Applications it tells you which one is newer or older:

Copying newer application over a older one:
 &lt;a href='http://img144.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oldermy9.png' rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Copying old application over a newer one:
&lt;a href="http://img504.imageshack.us/my.php?image=newerze6.png" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nice thing about the Mac on is if you are copying Applications it tells you which one is newer or older:</p>
<p>Copying newer application over a older one:<br />
 <a href='http://img144.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oldermy9.png' rel="nofollow" class="external"></a></p>
<p>Copying old application over a newer one:<br />
<a href="http://img504.imageshack.us/my.php?image=newerze6.png" rel="nofollow" class="external"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogo Piçarra</title>
		<link>http://org.against.org/70/#comment-6402</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogo Piçarra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://org.against.org/70/#comment-6402</guid>
		<description>Gnome dialog boxes just s**k and are completely useless.
The kde dialog is by far the best one. And are even better for images.
but it's just IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gnome dialog boxes just s**k and are completely useless.<br />
The kde dialog is by far the best one. And are even better for images.<br />
but it&#8217;s just IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oomu</title>
		<link>http://org.against.org/70/#comment-6400</link>
		<dc:creator>oomu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://org.against.org/70/#comment-6400</guid>
		<description>le gnome and mac ones are the best

they simply tell there are already a file with the same name.  the user can skip/stop or know it's normal and replace.

no need for "properties" because for most users, they don't care about file, cannot understand "0 bytes" or whatever.

if they know properties, they can see them in a file manager window.  the main "properties" for most, very most of people is the Name. not size, type, date, or whatever.

--
you are not the most user, you prove that by knowing file have properties.

--
people are not stupid, the contrary.  they have others skills, works and passions but they don't love intern arcane of computers ,  so the computer should assist them, 

Yes, but not hurl people with "properties".  The name is enough and a simple way to check the files before moving/copying.

--
in most cases, when people doesn't understand a dialogbox, they will simply close it or let it open and do something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>le gnome and mac ones are the best</p>
<p>they simply tell there are already a file with the same name.  the user can skip/stop or know it&#8217;s normal and replace.</p>
<p>no need for &#8220;properties&#8221; because for most users, they don&#8217;t care about file, cannot understand &#8220;0 bytes&#8221; or whatever.</p>
<p>if they know properties, they can see them in a file manager window.  the main &#8220;properties&#8221; for most, very most of people is the Name. not size, type, date, or whatever.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
you are not the most user, you prove that by knowing file have properties.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
people are not stupid, the contrary.  they have others skills, works and passions but they don&#8217;t love intern arcane of computers ,  so the computer should assist them, </p>
<p>Yes, but not hurl people with &#8220;properties&#8221;.  The name is enough and a simple way to check the files before moving/copying.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
in most cases, when people doesn&#8217;t understand a dialogbox, they will simply close it or let it open and do something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel Padilha</title>
		<link>http://org.against.org/70/#comment-6397</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Padilha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://org.against.org/70/#comment-6397</guid>
		<description>I must agree with just about everything you say. Even the most simple and recurring interfaces (like the file overwrite prompt, or the &lt;a href="http://blogs.fe.up.pt/mpadilha/2007/11/13/formulario-de-login/" rel="nofollow"&gt;login form&lt;/a&gt;) can and usually are implemented in a thousand different ways.

Where is the gap between the perceived simplicity of the problem and the complexity that the myriad of solutions suggests?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree with just about everything you say. Even the most simple and recurring interfaces (like the file overwrite prompt, or the <a href="http://blogs.fe.up.pt/mpadilha/2007/11/13/formulario-de-login/" rel="nofollow" class="external">login form</a>) can and usually are implemented in a thousand different ways.</p>
<p>Where is the gap between the perceived simplicity of the problem and the complexity that the myriad of solutions suggests?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.689 seconds -->
